Zeke Upshaw
SG/SF, 6-6, 215
Senior, 23 years old (via Illinois State)
Hometown: Chicago, IL
Season (36.5 mpg): 20 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 1.8 APG
40% FG, 35% three-point (8 attempts)
*If the videos do not appear, please “refresh” the webpage once
Towson 83, Hofstra 77
Saturday, February 22, 2014 | Mack Sports Complex (Hempstead, NY)
Zeke Upshaw — SG/SF, 6-6, 215
Senior, 23 years old (via Illinois State)
Season (36.3 mpg): 19.4 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2 APG, 2.9 TO
40% FG, 34% three-point, 74% FT, 18 PER
Using 30% of Hofstra’s shots (91st nationally)
Game: 33 pts, 4 rbs, 3 ast, 6 to
9-21 FG, 3-10 three-point, 12-12 FT
Outlook: Upshaw is a 6-6 swingman whose first instinct is to score. His size allows him to get clear shooting looks, either curling off screens or in spot-up situations. Without a quick first step, he curls off screens to catch and penetrate, where he can attack and leverage his size to accumulate free throws (6.8 FTA). Careless shot selection, but he provides a scoring output that Hofstra desperately needs.
Upshaw transferred from Illinois State this season, via the graduate transfer rule. Quite a remarkable spike in production:
2010-11 (ILST): 5.3 MPG, 0.9 PPG, 0.4 RPG, 0.2 APG
2011-12 (ILST): 5.4 MPG, 1.4 PPG, 0.6 RPG, 0.1 APG
2012-13 (ILST): 7.4 MPG, 2.4 PPG, 1.1 RPG, 0.6 APG
2013-14 (HOF): 36.4 MPG, 19.7 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 2 APG
Now at Hofstra, he is the Pride’s go-to scorer. He’s shooting 40% from the field, and 35% from 3. Not efficient, but he gets the job done; he’s scored over 25 points in eight games, including a 37-point performance at Richmond.
That said, he has poor form (releases the ball from his chest) and shot selection. He’s also slow off the bounce—which would severely hamper him at the next level—and he is an average athlete.
Upshaw can grab rebounds due to his 6-6 frame, but I wouldn’t say he consistently competes on the glass. He averages 4.2 rebounds, but produces only a 3.3% offensive rebounding percentage, and 10.3% defensive rebounding percentage, average marks at best.
Additionally, he posts a negative assist-to-turnover ratio, which speaks to a) his limited offensive game, and b) a tendency to force plays.
Overall, Upshaw is Hofstra’s go-to scorer. He draws foul and has range on his shot. But he doesn’t contribute in other areas, and I can’t imagine Upshaw scoring against NBA competition.
I suspect he’ll earn a paycheck playing basketball somewhere next season, but not in the NBA.
Strengths
— Good size at 6-6
— Excellent curling off screens; terrific range on jump shot
— Volume scorer; capable of getting hot and scoring in bunches
— Polished “runner” down the lane
— Decent rebounder
Defects/Areas of Improvement
— Lacks quickness off the bounce
— Careless shot selection, leading to 40% FG and 34% 3-pointers
— Releases the ball from his chest
— Inconsistent rebounder
— Poor facilitator (doesn’t do much besides score)
— Will struggle to score in the NBA (he’s a good scorer, but Upshaw has never “imposed his will” scoring the basketball)
Video
Video: 33 points vs. Towson
— Good size
Video: Misses (9-21 vs. Towson, 9-18 vs. Delaware)
Video: Drawing Fouls
— 6.8 FTA per game
Video: Finishing Struggles
— 23% of shots are around the basket; 1.1 PPP ranks in the 47th percentile nationally
Video: Runner
— Only 27 attempts on the season, but film shows he has soft touch in this pocket of the court
Video: Struggles to create off the dribble
— Excessively dribbles, leading to difficult shot attempts
Video: Curling Off Screens (excellent)
— Most effective way to score. Shooting 45% off screens
Video: Perimeter Defense (contesting jump shots)
— Good length to contest shots. Holding opponents to 30% shooting off the dribble
